Identity and permissions
Which identities and permissions are required? What remains read-only? How are credentials protected, revoked and rotated?
Use these questions before authorizing data collection or management. A design statement is not proof that a particular control has been implemented or independently assessed.
Which identities and permissions are required? What remains read-only? How are credentials protected, revoked and rotated?
What categories leave the environment, to which providers and regions, for what purpose, and with what retention?
What evidence demonstrates tenant isolation? Who can access customer information and how is that access approved and recorded?
How are targets, artifacts, actions and approval windows bound? How can the customer stop execution?
What independently checks the outcome? What is recoverable, what is not, and what restoration evidence exists?
What exact release artifacts, provenance, dependency records, tests and external assessments apply to this scope?
Keep the release identifier, question, source evidence, owner, limitation and approval decision together. Do not replace missing evidence with a roadmap statement. Qualified external security and legal reviews remain distinct from internal engineering checks.
Describe your requirements without sending credentials, production configuration or confidential customer data. Agree an appropriate secure exchange before sharing sensitive material.